The Other Fast Lens Advantage

To maintain a shutter speed of 1/200 and an aperture of 3.2, the camera chose ISO 3200 for this image. Noise reduction software reduced the overall sharpness. Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 lens @ 52mm.

“Low light” is a relative concept. Landscape and architectural photographers work with light levels far lower than those available to theater and dance photographers, but the challenge is similar: we need to find the right combination of ISO, shutter speed, and aperture to produce high quality images.  I need fast shutter speeds to freeze action, so I need a lot more light than someone photographing Half-Dome on a windless dawn.

As some of you know, I pine for the Nikon D3s, aka “The Lord of Darkness,” but I recently got a pleasant reminder that there are less expensive options for better low light results – and some of them are already in my camera bag.

Last week I photographed a dress rehearsal of the Ojai Art Center Theater production of Sylvia. Because there was a test audience, I did not want to roam the theater and distract them, so I settled into the second row. I shot most of the performance with my Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 zoom lens, but every now and then, I used my ancient 85mm f/1.8. And, as usual, I managed to be surprised at the superior quality of the images made with the 85. Will I ever learn?

This image seems snappier than the one above. Because I could open the lens up to f/2.2, the camera chose ISO 2200. I didn't feel that it needed noise reduction, so the final image retains more sharpness.

The 17-55 f/2.8 is a very high quality lens, and it is considered a fast lens. But the f/1.8 lens is much faster, allowing more than twice the amount of light into the camera. This allows the camera to focus better, because it can see better. It also allows the sensor to record at lower ISO values, which improves dynamic range and reduces noise/grain.

Images captured with the faster lens are not necessarily sharper because the lens is sharper; they are sharper because I did not have to apply noise reduction software, which minimizes grain by subtly blurring the image.

I love the sharpness, color and contrast of the 85 f/1.8, but it offered too tight an angle of view for scenes of two or more people. Still, at ISO 1250 and without noise reduction, you can see that this is sharper and more smoothly toned than the image below.

There are other trade-offs, of course. Shooting from a fixed location, one gives up a zoom’s focal length flexibility for the faster aperture of a fixed focal length lens. I don’t like to change lenses frequently, especially in the dark, but next time I’ll probably bring my faster prime lenses and leave the slower zooms at home. I’m not particularly unhappy with the pictures from the 17-55, and they serve their purpose, but images lose a lot of sharpness by the time a newspaper gets through with them, so I want to start with the sharpest photos I can make.

There's no way I get this shot with an 85mm lens from the second row of the theater. This one required the 17-55 @ 38mm. It also required ISO 3200 and noise reduction. Next time I'll bring along my 35mm f/2.0 to see what it can do.

Leave a comment

Filed under Camera Gear, Dance and Theater, Low Light

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s